0.03/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.11	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.11/0.32	% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
0.11/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.11/0.32	% WCLimit    : 240
0.11/0.32	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 02:27:19 EDT 2025
0.11/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.18/0.46	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.18/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.orkQRgs9Y7/E---3.1_30861.p
0.18/0.48	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.18/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.18/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 1200s (5) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting sh2lt with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# post_as_ho5 with pid 30939 completed with status 0
0.18/0.48	# Result found by post_as_ho5
0.18/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.18/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 1200s (5) cores
0.18/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
0.18/0.48	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-MHHFFMBN
0.18/0.48	# partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.18/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
0.18/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 649s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 121s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 109s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting sh2lt with 109s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting sh2l with 109s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# sh2lt with pid 30946 completed with status 0
0.18/0.48	# Result found by sh2lt
0.18/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.18/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 1200s (5) cores
0.18/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
0.18/0.48	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-MHHFFMBN
0.18/0.48	# partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.18/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
0.18/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 649s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 121s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 109s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting sh2lt with 109s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.18/0.48	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.18/0.48	
0.18/0.48	# Proof found!
0.18/0.48	# SZS status Theorem
0.18/0.48	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.18/0.48	thf(decl_23, type, cP: $o).
0.18/0.48	thf(decl_24, type, epred1_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.18/0.48	thf(decl_25, type, epred2_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.18/0.48	thf(decl_26, type, epred3_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.18/0.48	thf(decl_27, type, epred4_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.18/0.48	thf(cTHM120J_pme, conjecture, ?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((![X2:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X2 @ X2))&![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X4)<=((X1 @ X3 @ X4)&(X1 @ X2 @ X3)))))&~((X1 @ (^[X5:$i]:((~((cP))|(cP)))) @ (^[X6:$i]:(((cP)&~((cP))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.orkQRgs9Y7/E---3.1_30861.p', cTHM120J_pme)).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((![X2:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X2 @ X2))&![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ X3 @ X4)&(X1 @ X2 @ X3))=>(X1 @ X2 @ X4))))&~((X1 @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$i]:((~((cP))|(cP)))) @ (^[Z0/* 8 */:$i]:(((cP)&~((cP)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM120J_pme])])])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X12:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((((X12 @ (epred3_1 @ X12) @ (epred4_1 @ X12))|~(X12 @ (epred1_1 @ X12) @ (epred1_1 @ X12))|(X12 @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$i]:((~((cP))|(cP)))) @ (^[Z0/* 8 */:$i]:(((cP)&~((cP)))))))&((X12 @ (epred2_1 @ X12) @ (epred3_1 @ X12))|~(X12 @ (epred1_1 @ X12) @ (epred1_1 @ X12))|(X12 @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$i]:((~((cP))|(cP)))) @ (^[Z0/* 8 */:$i]:(((cP)&~((cP))))))))&(~(X12 @ (epred2_1 @ X12) @ (epred4_1 @ X12))|~(X12 @ (epred1_1 @ X12) @ (epred1_1 @ X12))|(X12 @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$i]:((~((cP))|(cP)))) @ (^[Z0/* 8 */:$i]:(((cP)&~((cP))))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$i]:((~((cP))|(cP)))) @ (^[Z0/* 8 */:$i]:(((cP)&~((cP))))))|~((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred1_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$i]:((~((cP))|(cP)))) @ (^[Z0/* 8 */:$i]:(((cP)&~((cP))))))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred1_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true))))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred1_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true))))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred1_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (((^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))))|((epred2_1 @ $eq)!=(epred4_1 @ $eq))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_5])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (((epred2_1 @ $eq)=(epred3_1 @ $eq))|((^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_6])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred3_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$i]:((~((cP))|(cP)))) @ (^[Z0/* 8 */:$i]:(((cP)&~((cP))))))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred1_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_1 @ $eq)!=(epred4_1 @ $eq)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_1 @ $eq)=(epred3_1 @ $eq)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred3_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true))))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred1_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((epred4_1 @ $eq)!=(epred3_1 @ $eq)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ((^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_12]), c_0_13])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])]), ['proof']).
0.18/0.48	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.18/0.48	# Parsed axioms                        : 2
0.18/0.48	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
0.18/0.48	# Initial clauses                      : 3
0.18/0.48	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.18/0.48	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
0.18/0.48	# Processed clauses                    : 26
0.18/0.48	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.18/0.48	# ...subsumed                          : 1
0.18/0.48	# ...remaining for further processing  : 24
0.18/0.48	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.18/0.48	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.18/0.48	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.18/0.48	# Backward-rewritten                   : 5
0.18/0.48	# Generated clauses                    : 54
0.18/0.48	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 38
0.18/0.48	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.18/0.48	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.18/0.48	# Paramodulations                      : 6
0.18/0.48	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.18/0.48	# NegExts                              : 3
0.18/0.48	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.18/0.48	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.18/0.48	# Total rewrite steps                  : 6
0.18/0.48	# ...of those cached                   : 4
0.18/0.48	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.18/0.48	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.18/0.48	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.18/0.48	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.18/0.48	# Current number of processed clauses  : 12
0.18/0.48	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
0.18/0.48	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.18/0.48	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.18/0.48	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 9
0.18/0.48	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
0.18/0.48	# ...number of literals in the above   : 32
0.18/0.48	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.18/0.48	# Current number of archived clauses   : 12
0.18/0.48	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11
0.18/0.48	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
0.18/0.48	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.18/0.48	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
0.18/0.48	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.18/0.48	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
0.18/0.48	# BW rewrite match successes           : 2
0.18/0.48	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.18/0.48	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.18/0.48	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 3890
0.18/0.48	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 126
0.18/0.48	
0.18/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.48	# User time                : 0.006 s
0.18/0.48	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.18/0.48	# Total time               : 0.008 s
0.18/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1852 pages
0.18/0.48	
0.18/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.48	# User time                : 0.022 s
0.18/0.48	# System time              : 0.012 s
0.18/0.48	# Total time               : 0.034 s
0.18/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
0.18/0.48	% E exiting
0.18/0.49	% E exiting
0.18/0.49	EOF